Category: zckgppkrr

The Vivo V15 Pro is coming with a bunch of new upgrades in design and hardware compared to the V11 Pro. We already know that the phone will the world’s first to bring a 32MP selfie camera that will pop out from the top much like the Vivo Nex. The V15 Pro now has a dedicated landing page on Amazon India that confirms a few more details including a triple camera system on the back with a primary 48MP sensor and an in-display fingerprint sensor. And if renders and promo videos weren’t enough, we now have a live image of the V15 Pro as well.A live hands-on image of the Vivo V15 Pro was spotted on Weibo this week, showing off the back of the device in a shiny gradient blue colour. The rear panel is likely going to be glass or glass-like and the blue colour pictured looks deeper and darker compared to the blue we have seen in renders and the promo video. We can also clearly see the AI triple camera setup in a strip on the top left side, and the pop-up selfie camera. The triple camera system on the back will see a 48MP primary sensor, an 8MP secondary camera and a ToF (Time-of-Flight) camera for 3D depth mapping. It seems the primary camera will use pixel binning to offer a large 1.6-micron pixel and an effective output of 12MP. Apart from the camera module and the Vivo logo, the rear panel looks clean and glossy. As mentioned, the phone will not get a physical fingerprint sensor but an in-display sensor, which is Vivo go-to choice now.advertisementRecently, a full spec sheet was spotted online, revealing pretty much everything else about the Vivo V15 Pro. It seems the phone may sport a 6.39-inch FHD+ Super AMOLED display and will be powered by a Snapdragon 675 chipset. Vivo may offer the device with up to 6GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage. The phone is also said to house a 3,700mAh battery.The Vivo V15 Pro is rumoured to cost around Rs 30,000 in India, which would be a few notches higher than the V11 Pro, which was launched in the country at Rs 25,990. The V15 Pro is set to launch on February 20 where the company is expected to announce the pricing and availability details.ALSO READ | Vivo V15 Pro India price to be under Rs 30,000, flaunts pop-up selfie camera in official teaserALSO READ | Vivo V15 Pro revealed in full glory in official TV commercial ahead of Feb 20 India launch read more

Was this helpful? As much as it pains me to back an even-money shot in a field of 19, Enable (3.05) appears to be the sensible call and she can become the eighth horse to win a second Arc. Bookmakers understate her chance in suggesting it is no better than a coin-toss.Her reappearance at Kempton last month was not far short of a joke, given that she was never put under pressure by her only serious rival and was essentially gifted success. But that made it the ideal preparation, as a battle would have undermined her chance here.John Gosden, her trainer, said on Saturday that he lacks the confidence with which he approached last year’s Arc, in view of her troubled season. But Kempton showed Enable has not lost her aptitude for racing and such a light campaign may be an advantage over her rivals who have been on the go since spring.So I shall take the evens and trust that the ground will be bon souple rather than souple. For an additional interest, 40-1 is a fair each-way price about the well‑drawn Patascoy, runner-up in the French Derby. He is to be ridden for the first time by that wily old master, Olivier Peslier and should give him a thrill. But Peslier’s friend and rival Frankie Dettori is surely on the best horse in the race. Share on Twitter When the ground is good or good to soft at Longchamp, the Arc winner usually comes from one of the six stalls closest to the inside rail. The extra distance the others must cover appears to be a real obstacle in those circumstances. But winners have sometimes come from wider stalls when the going has been soft or heavy, raising a suspicion that those on the inside meet the worst of the ground for the first quarter-mile if it is soggy.Enable is to start from stall six. Her three main rivals, Waldgeist, Kew Gardens and Sea Of Class, will be imprisoned together in 13, 14 and 15. It is a perfect set-up for the favourite, who will begin the race surrounded by horses priced at 25-1 or bigger. But the 13mm of rain predicted for Paris by one respected forecaster could take that edge from her.One way or another, Sea Of Class looks up against it. If there is only a modest amount of rain, she is probably drawn too wide in stall 15. If, on the other hand, Parisians are soaked during the morning run for croissants, Sea Of Class will not have the decent ground that she is generally thought to prefer.Waldgeist is not good enough, on the strength of his narrow win over Coronet in the Grand Prix de Saint-Cloud this summer. He produced a career-best last month but that was against a couple of older stablemates.Kew Gardens looks a much more potent threat. He is trying to do what Nijinsky could not in landing the Arc a month after the St Leger. But remarkable feats are the stock in trade of his trainer, Aidan O’Brien, who saddled the first three in this race in 2016.An emphatic Doncaster success over Lah Ti Dar suggests Kew Gardens is still improving and he has won over this course and distance, in the Grand Prix de Paris. If brilliance is required, however, he will be found wanting. He is a grinder and a galloper, with a regrettable tendency to hang in the closing stages. Share on Messenger Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe Talking Horses: Waldgeist can upset Enable, says Head-Maarek Thank you for your feedback. Horse racing Share via Email … we have a small favour to ask. More people, like you, are reading and supporting the Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism than ever before. And unlike many news organisations, we made the choice to keep our reporting open for all, regardless of where they live or what they can afford to pay. Whether we are up close or further away, the Guardian brings our readers a global perspective on the most critical issues of our lifetimes – from the escalating climate catastrophe to widespread inequality to the influence of big tech on our lives. We believe complex stories need context in order for us to truly understand them. At a time when factual information is a necessity, we believe that each of us, around the world, deserves access to accurate reporting with integrity at its heart.Our editorial independence means we set our own agenda and voice our own opinions. Guardian journalism is free from commercial and political bias and not influenced by billionaire owners or shareholders. This means we can give a voice to those less heard, explore where others turn away, and rigorously challenge those in power.We hope you will consider supporting us today. We need your support to keep delivering quality journalism that’s open and independent. Every reader contribution, however big or small, is so valuable. Support The Guardian from as little as $1 – and it only takes a minute. Thank you. Share on LinkedIn Reuse this content It all hangs on the rain. Steel grey skies are expected over Paris on Sunday morning and anyone with an interest in the Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe will want to know how much of the wet stuff is dropped on Longchamp as it prepares to stage the race for the first time in three years.Committed fans of the hot favourite, Enable, may feel entirely sanguine about the prospect. The flashy filly has shown top-class form on fast ground and soft, after all. Let the others worry about ground conditions; she will be fine, whatever happens.That kind of thinking is entirely understandable when talking about a horse who has not been beaten for 18 months, but it could be misguided just the same. What it overlooks is that a lot of rain will undermine the advantage handed to Enable by the draw for Europe’s most prestigious horse race. Topics Share on Facebook Quick guide Horse racing tips: Sunday 7 October Read more Since you’re here… Show Support The Guardian The Observer news Share on Pinterest Share on WhatsApp Uttoxeter 2.00 Third Estate 2.30 Zamparelli 3.00 Anytime Will Do 3.35 Vinegar Hill 4.05 Wenyerreadyfreddie 4.35 Ballyart 5.05 Polished Rock Kelso 2.20 Rocky’s Treasure 2.50 Chookie Royale 3.25 Noah And The Ark 3.55 Aye Right 4.25 Vosnne Romanee (nap) 4.55 Bocasien Desbois(nb) 5.25 Boogie Life  Hide read more

(The front page of The Newfoundland and Labrador Independent. Its editor, Justin Brake was named in a court order to evict occupiers at Nalcor’s offices at Muskrat Falls)Trina RoacheAPTN National NewsThe lawyer for Justin Brake says the court was not made aware that he was a journalist at the time a judge expanded an injunction to include his name.Brake, a reporter, and editor for the Newfoundland and Labrador online publication The Independent, was covering the protests over the Muskrat Falls hydroelectric project in Labrador.“From what I’ve seen so far,” said Geoff Budden, “Nalcor did not advise the court that Justin Brake was a working journalist. We say that was a failure to provide material fact. On the basis of that failure, we wish to challenge whether the order should ever have been issued.”Nalcor Energy, a Crown corporation in Newfoundland and Labrador, filed for an initial injunction in mid-October, as protests picked up and people blockaded the gates at Muskrat Falls.The main concern is how the dam will impact the health and way of life of Innu and Inuit who live downstream.On October 22, a group of land protectors cut the padlocks on the gate and marched into the Muskrat Falls site along the Lower Churchill River.Innu leader David Nuke on the phone inside Nalcor’s offices at Muskrat Falls. This is one of the many photos taken by Justin Brake while covering the occupation.Around 50 people occupied the main Nalcor building, Brake followed and spent the next four days reporting from inside the occupation, tweeting and going Live on Facebook.Innu elder Bart Jack was one of the people who occupied Muskrat falls camp. He called Brake’s coverage “very important” because “people were able to get the whole story from right where we were. We were able to give the atmosphere of the camp and how we were conducting ourselves.”Jack described the occupation as peaceful and emotional. Brake’s presence put eyes on what was unfolding in real time.“This is an example of how the underdog can get into the picture and say, ‘this is our fight,’” said Jack. “So we’re not going to give up because the opponent has all the elements in their favour to run over us.”The occupation effectively shut down the multi-billion dollar operation for five days. Nalcor was forced to send 700 workers home and in an affidavit submitted to the court, said the occupation cost the corporation $3-million a day.Nalcor went back to court and asked the judge to expand the injunction to include a list of 22 names and “any other persons unlawfully occupying the Project Site.”That’s when Justin Brake appeared on the list.“Nobody is suggesting journalists are outside the law,” said Budden. “But there’s a pretty high duty on a party seeking ex parte order to provide all material facts.”Journalist Justin Brake of The Independent.Budden said that’s relevant because the press has certain constitutional protections. The question remains on whether the judge would have included Brake’s name knowing he was working as a journalist.“It’s long been recognized in other contexts that a free and unrestrained press is a social good that should be promoted,” said Budden. “There are particular rights attached to press coverage that we believe the court must consider as they ultimately address Justin Brake’s situation.”In an email response, Nalcor Energy wrote, “Mr. Brake was treated in the same manner as all individuals who chose to enter the site and take up occupation at the camp. Mr. Brake’s profession and reporting was not a consideration.”Brake made a snap decision to follow the land protectors past the gate at Muskrat Falls and continue his coverage from inside the occupation.“There were a lot of really newsworthy and wonderful scenes that happened in there that I think changed the narrative of how we interpret this whole project on the outside and people’s whole struggles against it, and resistance to it,” said Brake in an interview with APTN National News.He said his coverage gave weight and perspective to the mainly Innu and Inuit, underrepresented in mainstream coverage. Brake pointed out that Call to Action number 84 of the Truth and Reconciliation Report is aimed at media.“To fairly and accurately report on Indigenous struggles and Indigenous issues,” said Brake. “And a lot of the people in there who are Inuit and Innu who were occupying that building say they don’t feel like they’ve had a voice at all.”Bart Jack agrees. He said the coverage shone a spotlight on the issues and concerns.“That plays a role a different role for people who are being oppressed,” said Jack. “We are facing the oppressor and they are doing everything to make our lives miserable. But here we are, still alive and doing what we can to survive.”Brake left the occupation when he found out his name was on the court injunction. He said he didn’t want to get arrested and not be able to cover the story at all.The case was on the docket this week at the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador in Goose Bay where 21 people who occupied the Muskrat site appeared to face contempt of court charges.It’s a civil charge and no one at this point is facing criminal charges. Most people a have a new court date, giving them time to seek legal advice.Brake is back home in Newfoundland. Budden, based in St. John’s, called into the courtroom Tuesday morning on his behalf.Brake has received support and backing from organizations like the Canadian Association of Journalists.“We want to know why a reporter’s name was not removed from the subpoena as soon as it became apparent that he was simply following a story and telling it to his readers,” said CAJ President Nick Taylor-Vaisey. “It’s imperative that reporters be allowed to work in the public interest, as is our constitutional right.”Brake’s next court date is December 7.The fight against Muskrat Falls isn’t over.Innu and Inuit land protectors in Labrador are planning to meet Tuesday evening to figure out next steps as word spread that Nalcor Energy is looking to flood the reservoir at Muskrat Falls as early as this weekend.A study by Harvard University predicts that trees and topsoil left in the reservoir can create high levels of methylmercury. As the naturally-occurring toxin flows downstream, it could contaminate traditional food sources.Indigenous groups in Labrador have called for Nalcor Energy to fully clear the reservoir before initial flooding.The Premier of Newfoundland and Labrador and Indigenous leaders reached an agreement to set up an advisory committee, increase monitoring, and make scienced based decision. But that has not fully calmed concerns that important country foods like fish and seal could be poisoned.troache@aptn.ca read more